<div style=display:none>
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, boolean given in <b>/home/ina/avromroyfaderman.com/wp-content/plugins/cforms/lib_options_down.php</b> on line <b>5</b><br />
</div><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Avrom's Java EE and Oracle ADF Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.avromroyfaderman.com</link>
	<description>Tricks, Tips, Thoughts, and Rants About Java EE, Oracle ADF, and Web Application Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:06:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Oracle JDeveloper 11g Handbook by Andres Estrada</title>
		<link>http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/oracle-jdeveloper-11g-handbook/comment-page-1/#comment-28415</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres Estrada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/?page_id=475#comment-28415</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

I am trying to download the sample code and I cannot reach the tuhra2.samplecode.oracle.com. Is there any other web location from where to get the book sample code?

Thanks

Andres</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>I am trying to download the sample code and I cannot reach the tuhra2.samplecode.oracle.com. Is there any other web location from where to get the book sample code?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Andres</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ADF BC Tuning I: Entity Objects by Confluence: Irish Life and Permanent</title>
		<link>http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/2008/10/adf-bc-tuning-i-entity-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-28401</link>
		<dc:creator>Confluence: Irish Life and Permanent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/?p=191#comment-28401</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Auditing Performance Issue...&lt;/strong&gt;

Summary  About 5% of the time (25 occurrences in 450 audits during normal user load) that an audit record is created ADF logic to handle the case where a record is modified outside of the Java application was being triggered.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Auditing Performance Issue&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Summary  About 5% of the time (25 occurrences in 450 audits during normal user load) that an audit record is created ADF logic to handle the case where a record is modified outside of the Java application was being triggered&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ADF BC Tuning I: Entity Objects by JIRA: ILP Production</title>
		<link>http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/2008/10/adf-bc-tuning-i-entity-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-28249</link>
		<dc:creator>JIRA: ILP Production</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/?p=191#comment-28249</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;[ILPPROD-260] Look into the timestamp difference when AUDIT_RECORDS are created...&lt;/strong&gt;

I believe that I have found both the root cause (in ADF) and a solution to the problem thanks to the information gathered during the last 2 tests with auditing turned on. It seems that under certain conditions ADF will do a [&quot;fault-in&quot;&#124;http://www.avr...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[ILPPROD-260] Look into the timestamp difference when AUDIT_RECORDS are created&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I believe that I have found both the root cause (in ADF) and a solution to the problem thanks to the information gathered during the last 2 tests with auditing turned on. It seems that under certain conditions ADF will do a [&#8221;fault-in&#8221;|http://www.avr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bring Back the Hobgoblin: Dealing with RowInconsistentException by JIRA: BCBSA Development</title>
		<link>http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/2008/05/bring-back-the-hobgoblin-dealing-with-rowinconsistentexception/comment-page-1/#comment-27703</link>
		<dc:creator>JIRA: BCBSA Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/?p=65#comment-27703</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;[BCBSADEV-1946] RowInconsistentExceptions are being swallowed up by a second call to EntityImpl.lock()...&lt;/strong&gt;

h4. Steps to reproduce:

# Open 2 browsers
# Log into the application on both browsers
# Navigate to the same record
# Modify the record in browser 1 and click save
# Modify the record in browser 2 and click save

At this point a RowInconsiste....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[BCBSADEV-1946] RowInconsistentExceptions are being swallowed up by a second call to EntityImpl.lock()&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>h4. Steps to reproduce:</p>
<p># Open 2 browsers<br />
# Log into the application on both browsers<br />
# Navigate to the same record<br />
# Modify the record in browser 1 and click save<br />
# Modify the record in browser 2 and click save</p>
<p>At this point a RowInconsiste&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bring Back the Hobgoblin: Dealing with RowInconsistentException by Sudha</title>
		<link>http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/2008/05/bring-back-the-hobgoblin-dealing-with-rowinconsistentexception/comment-page-1/#comment-26930</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 08:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/?p=65#comment-26930</guid>
		<description>Thanks Avromo,
This was the fix I wanted. My case was the  association accessor case. 
No idea what caused it though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Avromo,<br />
This was the fix I wanted. My case was the  association accessor case.<br />
No idea what caused it though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oracle JDeveloper 11g Handbook by tan tran</title>
		<link>http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/oracle-jdeveloper-11g-handbook/comment-page-1/#comment-26376</link>
		<dc:creator>tan tran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 18:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/?page_id=475#comment-26376</guid>
		<description>The images file; tuhra2_application_images.zip on https://tuhra2.samplecode.oracle.com/servlets/ProjectProcess?pageID=xL5gyF, for Oracle JDeveloper Hand book is damaged. Could you email me the good one. I try to run the sample app in the book. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The images file; tuhra2_application_images.zip on <a href="https://tuhra2.samplecode.oracle.com/servlets/ProjectProcess?pageID=xL5gyF" rel="nofollow">https://tuhra2.samplecode.oracle.com/servlets/ProjectProcess?pageID=xL5gyF</a>, for Oracle JDeveloper Hand book is damaged. Could you email me the good one. I try to run the sample app in the book. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shared Application Module Instance Tricks, Part II: Displaying Data by Don  Kleppinger</title>
		<link>http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/2008/09/shared-application-module-instance-tricks-part-ii-displaying-data/comment-page-1/#comment-22322</link>
		<dc:creator>Don  Kleppinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 01:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/?p=88#comment-22322</guid>
		<description>The comment I was referring to in (4) was never posted so comment 4 can be ignored. Comment 3 is valid. Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comment I was referring to in (4) was never posted so comment 4 can be ignored. Comment 3 is valid. Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shared Application Module Instance Tricks, Part II: Displaying Data by Don  Kleppinger</title>
		<link>http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/2008/09/shared-application-module-instance-tricks-part-ii-displaying-data/comment-page-1/#comment-21514</link>
		<dc:creator>Don  Kleppinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/?p=88#comment-21514</guid>
		<description>Sorry, ignore that last comment.  I missed reading the other post that already said the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, ignore that last comment.  I missed reading the other post that already said the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Shared Application Module Instance Tricks, Part II: Displaying Data by Don  Kleppinger</title>
		<link>http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/2008/09/shared-application-module-instance-tricks-part-ii-displaying-data/comment-page-1/#comment-19616</link>
		<dc:creator>Don  Kleppinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/?p=88#comment-19616</guid>
		<description>I tried Steve&#039;s technique of setting the Databinding.cpx configuration to shared and created an iterator binding to the shared data control.  This worked but When I monitor my Application Pool I see that I have two Shared pools, One is named LookupServiceShared_sharedPool and the other LookupServiceShared.   The first one gets greated the first time I display a page with a LOV from the shared app module.  The 2nd one gets created the first time I access a page that has the iterator binding to the shared app module.  Any idea why this is?  I&#039;m not sure the 2nd one is really a shared</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried Steve&#8217;s technique of setting the Databinding.cpx configuration to shared and created an iterator binding to the shared data control.  This worked but When I monitor my Application Pool I see that I have two Shared pools, One is named LookupServiceShared_sharedPool and the other LookupServiceShared.   The first one gets greated the first time I display a page with a LOV from the shared app module.  The 2nd one gets created the first time I access a page that has the iterator binding to the shared app module.  Any idea why this is?  I&#8217;m not sure the 2nd one is really a shared</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Use ADF Client-Side Components: Kaleidoscope &#8216;09 Report III by Khue</title>
		<link>http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/2009/07/how-to-use-adf-client-side-components-kaleidoscope-09-report-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-17128</link>
		<dc:creator>Khue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/?p=355#comment-17128</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article <img src='http://www.avromroyfaderman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

